Here is my Case
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I have a common report object residing on Reporting Service. The report
shows Monthly Activity for a Department. This report is based on a Stored
Procedure and has Department ID as a parameter.
Through an application different departments either can run this report or
create a schedule so that at the end of each month, any department can get
the report related to only its data.
How can I do that?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
You input highly appreciatble...Hi Sue,
This is more an issue for the developers of the applications calling the
report as they will be passing the DepartmentID.
How can the app know which department it is run from? Is there a setting in
Active Directory for the user? Is there a database table somewhere with who
lives in which department? (very messy to maintain).
I'd be querying AD if possible.
"Sue" wrote:
> Here is my Case
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> I have a common report object residing on Reporting Service. The report
> shows Monthly Activity for a Department. This report is based on a Stored
> Procedure and has Department ID as a parameter.
> Through an application different departments either can run this report or
> create a schedule so that at the end of each month, any department can get
> the report related to only its data.
> How can I do that?
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> You input highly appreciatble...
>|||Hi Mary:
Thank you for your response.
I have been using RS API calls to generate the Report from my Web Application.
While generating a report the system already know the Dapartment ID based on
the person who logged in.
Let me give you more information regarding this problem.
1. Report object already exists in the common folder located in the
Reporting Server.
2. End-User can supply Department ID is supplied throgh the program. How can
I perform generate ad-hoc report?
3. How can the end-user schedule this report?
Your input highly appreciatable.
Thanks
Sue
"Mary Bray [SQL Server MVP]" wrote:
> Hi Sue,
> This is more an issue for the developers of the applications calling the
> report as they will be passing the DepartmentID.
> How can the app know which department it is run from? Is there a setting in
> Active Directory for the user? Is there a database table somewhere with who
> lives in which department? (very messy to maintain).
> I'd be querying AD if possible.
> "Sue" wrote:
> > Here is my Case
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > I have a common report object residing on Reporting Service. The report
> > shows Monthly Activity for a Department. This report is based on a Stored
> > Procedure and has Department ID as a parameter.
> >
> > Through an application different departments either can run this report or
> > create a schedule so that at the end of each month, any department can get
> > the report related to only its data.
> >
> > How can I do that?
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > You input highly appreciatble...
> >
> >sql
Showing posts with label activity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label activity. Show all posts
Friday, March 23, 2012
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
'PAGEIOLATCH_SH
In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
Can any body help?Hi
Google does though!!
Try:
http://www.sqldev.net/misc/waittypes.htm
John
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx
.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?|||I have heard that this might also indicate contention due to a large number
of indexes on the same table...
(although I personally have not encountered it)
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx
.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?|||I've encountered this.
I may be talking out of my 4th-Point-Of-Contact, but it can also be attribut
ed to multi-processor machines and faulty optimization
(parallelism). I've worked around it by applying the optimizer option MAXDOP
.
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/case_studies.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;EN-US;243589
http://www.databasejournal.com/feat...cle.php/1438891
ChrisG
BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
Can any body help?Hi
Google does though!!
Try:
http://www.sqldev.net/misc/waittypes.htm
John
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx
.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?|||I have heard that this might also indicate contention due to a large number
of indexes on the same table...
(although I personally have not encountered it)
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx
.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?|||I've encountered this.
I may be talking out of my 4th-Point-Of-Contact, but it can also be attribut
ed to multi-processor machines and faulty optimization
(parallelism). I've worked around it by applying the optimizer option MAXDOP
.
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/case_studies.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;EN-US;243589
http://www.databasejournal.com/feat...cle.php/1438891
ChrisG
'PAGEIOLATCH_SH
In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
Can any body help?Hi
Google does though!!
Try:
http://www.sqldev.net/misc/waittypes.htm
John
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?|||I have heard that this might also indicate contention due to a large number
of indexes on the same table...
(although I personally have not encountered it)
--
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?|||I've encountered this.
I may be talking out of my 4th-Point-Of-Contact, but it can also be attributed to multi-processor machines and faulty optimization
(parallelism). I've worked around it by applying the optimizer option MAXDOP.
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/case_studies.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;243589
http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/1438891
ChrisG
BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
Can any body help?Hi
Google does though!!
Try:
http://www.sqldev.net/misc/waittypes.htm
John
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?|||I have heard that this might also indicate contention due to a large number
of indexes on the same table...
(although I personally have not encountered it)
--
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?|||I've encountered this.
I may be talking out of my 4th-Point-Of-Contact, but it can also be attributed to multi-processor machines and faulty optimization
(parallelism). I've worked around it by applying the optimizer option MAXDOP.
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/case_studies.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;243589
http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/1438891
ChrisG
'PAGEIOLATCH_SH
In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
Can any body help?
Hi
Google does though!!
Try:
http://www.sqldev.net/misc/waittypes.htm
John
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?
|||I have heard that this might also indicate contention due to a large number
of indexes on the same table...
(although I personally have not encountered it)
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?
|||I've encountered this.
I may be talking out of my 4th-Point-Of-Contact, but it can also be attributed to multi-processor machines and faulty optimization
(parallelism). I've worked around it by applying the optimizer option MAXDOP.
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/case_studies.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;243589
http://www.databasejournal.com/featu...le.php/1438891
ChrisG
BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
Can any body help?
Hi
Google does though!!
Try:
http://www.sqldev.net/misc/waittypes.htm
John
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?
|||I have heard that this might also indicate contention due to a large number
of indexes on the same table...
(although I personally have not encountered it)
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mat" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1ee9301c4577b$3f2d8c00$a301280a@.phx.gbl...
> In current activity i have a wait type of 'PAGEIOLATCH_SH'
> BOL and other sources make no referance to this.
> Can any body help?
|||I've encountered this.
I may be talking out of my 4th-Point-Of-Contact, but it can also be attributed to multi-processor machines and faulty optimization
(parallelism). I've worked around it by applying the optimizer option MAXDOP.
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/case_studies.asp
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;243589
http://www.databasejournal.com/featu...le.php/1438891
ChrisG
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)