Parallelism - Standard vs Enterprise Edition

We were told by a Microsoft representative that Intraquery Parallelism is
available only in the Enterprise Edition of SQL 2005. Can anyone confirm den
y
that and support with documentation?
Standard fits our needs all other features, but I don't want to lose
Intraquery Parallelism.
TerryIntraquery parallelism is available in all editions which supports > 1 proce
ssor. There are only
certain type of operations going over several processors that only EE can do
. See
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodin...e-features.mspx
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Terry" <Terry@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0081E754-B590-43F2-B571-06526EF3C270@.microsoft.com...
> We were told by a Microsoft representative that Intraquery Parallelism is
> available only in the Enterprise Edition of SQL 2005. Can anyone confirm d
eny
> that and support with documentation?
> Standard fits our needs all other features, but I don't want to lose
> Intraquery Parallelism.
> Terry

Parallelism - Standard vs Enterprise Edition

We were told by a Microsoft representative that Intraquery Parallelism is
available only in the Enterprise Edition of SQL 2005. Can anyone confirm deny
that and support with documentation?
Standard fits our needs all other features, but I don't want to lose
Intraquery Parallelism.
TerryIntraquery parallelism is available in all editions which supports > 1 processor. There are only
certain type of operations going over several processors that only EE can do. See
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Terry" <Terry@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0081E754-B590-43F2-B571-06526EF3C270@.microsoft.com...
> We were told by a Microsoft representative that Intraquery Parallelism is
> available only in the Enterprise Edition of SQL 2005. Can anyone confirm deny
> that and support with documentation?
> Standard fits our needs all other features, but I don't want to lose
> Intraquery Parallelism.
> Terry