I'm trying to use a report parameter in my where clause to compare against
the month portion of a field. Reporting Services (version 2000) does not seem
to like this. Here's the WHERE clause I'm trying to get to work (of course
it's all on one line):
WHERE (company = @.Company) AND (MONTH(close_time) = @.DSMonth1) AND
(YEAR(close_time) = @.DSYear1)
When I try to execute the query, I get an error that states:
Invalid object name "dbo.RAW_DW.MONTH"
Invalid object name "dbo.RAW_DW.YEAR"
It seems Reporting Services thinks MONTH and YEAR are fields when I'm just
trying to use the MONTH and YEAR functions to extract that data from the
datetime field (close_time) and compare it to the report parameter. It may
just be a formatting issue on my part.
Does anyone know what's wrong with the clause?
Thanks in advance.
BrendaHi Brenda,
I dont think that the error you are getting is related to the WHERE clause
in this case. Do you have RAW_DW.Month and ...YEAR in your overall query?
What are the data types of the two parameters, @.DSMonth1 and @.DSYear1?
Without seeing the full query, it is hard to troubleshoot the error, if
indeed these are valid objects in your database.
Rodney Landrum
"BLKeller" <BLKeller@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:69A3593E-8832-46BB-ADD1-A1079829C95E@.microsoft.com...
> I'm trying to use a report parameter in my where clause to compare against
> the month portion of a field. Reporting Services (version 2000) does not
> seem
> to like this. Here's the WHERE clause I'm trying to get to work (of course
> it's all on one line):
> WHERE (company = @.Company) AND (MONTH(close_time) = @.DSMonth1) AND
> (YEAR(close_time) = @.DSYear1)
> When I try to execute the query, I get an error that states:
> Invalid object name "dbo.RAW_DW.MONTH"
> Invalid object name "dbo.RAW_DW.YEAR"
> It seems Reporting Services thinks MONTH and YEAR are fields when I'm just
> trying to use the MONTH and YEAR functions to extract that data from the
> datetime field (close_time) and compare it to the report parameter. It may
> just be a formatting issue on my part.
> Does anyone know what's wrong with the clause?
> Thanks in advance.
> Brenda
Showing posts with label version. Show all posts
Showing posts with label version. Show all posts
Monday, March 26, 2012
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Paper about SQL Server 2005
Hey,
did anyone know a good paper or a good ms link about SQL Server 2005 -
because I have problems to install the Beta Version..
thanks very muchHi
SQL 2005 Beta newsgroups:
http://communities.microsoft.com/ne...ver2005.express
Regards
----------
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Philipp" <Philipp_Gufler@.yahoo.de> wrote in message
news:42597997$1@.e-post.inode.at...
> Hey,
> did anyone know a good paper or a good ms link about SQL Server 2005 -
> because I have problems to install the Beta Version..
> thanks very much
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)